Taş, A. 2015. Evaluation of phacoemulsification process differences between with intraocular foldable hydrophilic lens (IOL) and without IOL (viscoelastic applied) techniques on dogs with cataract. Tubita, Ankara, pp.1.

Taş, A., (2015). Evaluation of phacoemulsification process differences between with intraocular foldable hydrophilic lens (IOL) and without IOL (viscoelastic applied) techniques on dogs with cataract . Tubita. Ankara. pp.1.

Taş, Abuzer. Evaluation of phacoemulsification process differences between with intraocular foldable hydrophilic lens (IOL) and without IOL (viscoelastic applied) techniques on dogs with cataract. Ankara: Tubita, pp.1, 2015

Taş, Abuzer. "Evaluation of phacoemulsification process differences between with intraocular foldable hydrophilic lens (IOL) and without IOL (viscoelastic applied) techniques on dogs with cataract." Tubita, 2015, pp.1.

Taş, A. (2015). "Evaluation of phacoemulsification process differences between with intraocular foldable hydrophilic lens (IOL) and without IOL (viscoelastic applied) techniques on dogs with cataract", Ankara: Tubita.

@expertreport{expertreport, author ={Abuzer Taş}, title={Evaluation of phacoemulsification process differences between with intraocular foldable hydrophilic lens (IOL) and without IOL (viscoelastic applied) techniques on dogs with cataract}, corporate={Tubita}, city={Ankara},year={2015} }