Atıf İçin Kopyala
Aslan R., Erbin A., Eryılmaz R., Taken K.
CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, cilt.73, sa.2, ss.140-145, 2020 (ESCI)
-
Yayın Türü:
Makale / Tam Makale
-
Cilt numarası:
73
Sayı:
2
-
Basım Tarihi:
2020
-
Doi Numarası:
10.5173/ceju.2020.0075
-
Dergi Adı:
CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
-
Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler:
Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, CAB Abstracts, Central & Eastern European Academic Source (CEEAS), EMBASE
-
Sayfa Sayıları:
ss.140-145
-
Anahtar Kelimeler:
periprostatic nerve block, prostate biopsy, pudendal nerve blockage, 1-PERCENT LIDOCAINE, LOCAL-ANESTHESIA, DOUBLE-BLIND, PAIN, RELIEF
-
Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Adresli:
Evet
Özet
Introduction Although the periprostatic nerve block (PNB) is accepted as the standard method for local anesthesia prior to transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy, it is not the most ideal method. We aimed to analyze the effectiveness and safety of bilateral pudendal nerve blockage (PuNB) by comparing with PNB.