Criticism is academic writing that is written on a literary work. There are so many kinds of criticism that vary according to different attitudes, trends, writers, and cultures. Although they are different from each other, all of them have in common that adopt assessment based on human-centered concerns. There are so many kinds of criticism, historical, sociological, personal (relative), impressionistic, factual, structural, and eco-criticism taking into account nature. Relative- criticism, which includes the variability in which the limitation is left to the critic a little more, appears as irregular. In the ‘Impressionist’ criticism, the pleasure it gives to the reader is adopted as a measure in the evaluation of the work. In ’structural’ criticism, a work-centered approach is adopted and internal and external elements are criticized. In addition to these, approaches such as Feminist-Criticism ’and Eco-Criticism emerged with the effect of phenomena such as feminism and ecology. Until this criticism emerged, the human-centered perspective, which is the basic principle in criticism, was replaced with a perspective shared with all beings such as living, inanimate, organic, inorganic, synthetic, and chemical. In this paper, issues like disrupting the ecological balance of the world, destroying the future, developing agriculture with harmful substances due to economic reasons, using hormones to increase the product, combating harmful insects in agriculture, and polluting nature with chemical waste were discussed, The idea of the preservation of inanimate beings for living beings based on the idea of existential relations of the layers of existence will be examined in the context of eco-criticism, which requires an interdisciplinary approach that requires every scientific thought.